Airlines always try to make some difference (or at least we’d like to think that) to always be ahead of their competitors. Sometimes they change logos, and sometimes even names. Is new here better than old? Let’s take example of two Russian and one American airlines.
Aeroflot is the flag carrier of Russia. This name is more than 80 years old (my mother has a medal commemorating Aeroflot’s 80th anniversary: she was once an air hostess). The name was left after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the united Aeroflot. At one point they thought of saying goodbye to Aeroflot’s sickle and hammer in wings’ logo. But after most customers said they liked it, the logo was left to shine. It is indeed a very nice emblem going very well together with Aeroflot’s typeface. Here how it looked until early 2000s:
. Then some English company was chosen as an advisor to Aeroflot’s rebranding campaign. It was that company that initially suggested discarding sickle and hammer. Aeroflot was wise enough to consult its customers (I recall taking part in an online questionnaire). In the end, they came out with new livery colours for crew costumes and planes, and a new logo. The sickle and hammer in wings was left, but they added an orange smile ending with a tricolour tip symbolising the Russian flag.
The smile goes now with Aeroflot’s new motto, Sincerely Yours, instead of decades long Fly on Aeroflot’s planes (which sounds better in Russian than in English). Personally, I’d live with the previous logo, but at least the new one is not so bad, or not as bad new logo as it could have been.
Now comes an example of how a new logo could be worse (again, to my personal taste). The example comes from over the Pond on board of Delta. The decades long logo here was a blue triangle with red foundation. The foundation always went through perturbations resulting in sharp or smooth edges:
Here’s Delta of the 80s with sharp edges. And here’s Delta from early 90s and then late 90s.
Still sharp edges but different typeface. Plus “AirLines” added in the 90s. Then comes the 21st century that left “AirLines” to the past, but played with shades of blue and smoother border between blue and red between 2000 and 2004. The second logo below lived until 2007 and had sharp edges again. And I like it that way.

But some people in Delta’s headquarters thought differently. They decided that there was too much blue for years (blue years for Delta including, in the sense “sad”) and they needed something brighter and radiating new energy of a company trying to emerge from bankruptcy. The result (below) is an all-red new triangle.
The triangle is sharp and has a middle line that accentuates a slightly 3D look. But the triangle is smaller. The typeface is also quite unorthodox for Delta, sans-serif, though still blue, yet darker aggressive shade. To me, that is not quite (maybe yet) a change for better.
Well, sometimes airlines even change their names. Here’s again a Russian example from a company I’ve never flown. Siberia Airlines is a chunk of former Soviet Aeroflot and the second largest air company in Russia. I quite like their classic logo with the name Siberia in Russian.
This logo is from early 90s and Siberia’s childhood. Look how nicely the letters are connected with each other. In late 90s they separated the letters (isn’t divorce a bad thing?).
The incline (smaller), though, is still there. In early 2000s Siberia bosses for some unreasonable reason decided that Siberia was a name closely connected with the Soviet past (though there wasn’t any Siberia Airlines in the Soviet times) and with the old service of the Soviet flavour. The company was rebranded S7 Airlines (S7 is Siberia’s IATA code) and they painted their planes in green. The company is trying to present itself as a somewhat analogue of European low-cost airlines, though it is not. Hence, the poisonous green and pink.
If you can agree to new colours, I wouldn’t but won’t fight. If it comes to the name (and frankly the very first logo), I wouldn’t agree at all. The word “Siberia” is as easily pronounced in English as “S7″ (pronunciation was also mentioned among the reasons why the name was changed). The service can be altered, the image is based on many factors including air safety records, punctuality, customer friendliness, etc. But the image is a tricky thing and I do not see any reason in why this radically new image is better.